Over the years, CalQlata's engineers have used and devised many technical formulas and are now keen to make these available in an accessible and useable form to everyone who may not have the time, resources or ability to learn or develop such formulas for themselves.
Remember, it isn't the formulas and calculations that are important: it's what you do with the answers. You don't need to be technically competent to know how best to handle these. It is to everyone's benefit if the non-technically minded have equal access to technical answers.
We want to dispel the myth that technical subjects can only be of interest to a select few. Too often, technicians present their work in a form that deters mere mortals from attempting to understand them and formulas can terrify the uninitiated.
CalQlata's engineers believe that technical subjects written in a reader-friendly manner would attract more interest and that if calculation tools (software programs) were sufficiently user-friendly more people would apply them.
With this in mind, we remove complicated formulas from view and restrict simple formulas to 'Help' sections and Appendices where those with an interest in detail can access them. We also try to employ everyday language and minimise the use of specialist terms and acronyms. Where the use of such terms cannot be avoided we have provided a definitions page that is accessible in the menu at the top of every web page. There will also be a link to its definition (e.g. proton) the first time such a term is used on any page.
CalQlata is not only targeting the less technically minded, however. We also provide sufficient technical references to assist those who wish to delve deeper into a subject or find the formulas for themselves.
We have no preferred subject or category. Whilst we will cover engineering, physics, mathematical, technical and chemical subjects with equal fervour, we will initially concentrate on those with which we have had most experience to date: engineering and mathematics.
Our aim is to make our calculators as simple, flexible and user friendly as possible in the hope that they will encourage you to 'have-a-go' and, where possible, help you select the correct calculator and input variables from this website.
Although we have a preferred format, designed to: minimise screen use, eliminate unnecessary embellishments and highlight incorrect or inappropriate data entries whilst giving you the freedom to enter anything you like, we realise that the world out there may have other ideas.
If you think we can improve our calculators or Help-Text, please let us know. Customer suggestions regarding operational improvements or technical corrections are always welcome.
CalQlata believes that much scientific research is carried out today purely for the benefit of its sponsors and therefore reaches biased (e.g. wind turbine generators, Batteries, Diesel, etc.) or even incorrect (e.g. atmospheric CO₂, holes in the ozone layer, etc.) conclusions. Whilst misrepresentation may be considered acceptable for many scientific subjects, it should not be acceptable for those that affect all of us, e.g.: environment, medicine, life, transport, physics, etc.
CalQlata has included 'PhD Topics' on this website to highlight a few subjects we believe are sufficiently important (e.g. unification theory) or interesting (e.g. the reason for the Deccan Traps eruption) to warrant independent research whereby conclusions are not distorted for political and/or financial gain and made freely available to all.
CalQlata suspects that PhDs might be the only remaining independent research platform, as such we would like to encourage their use for our suggested topics.
According to convention, a PhD dissertation must contain a "substantial, original contribution to knowledge". CalQlata believes that a further two qualifications should also be applied:
1) "The knowledge must be generated independent of influence from those with a vested interest in the outcome"
and;
2) "The subject matter should be useful to life on earth"
CalQlata was found in 2013 to help individuals (not companies) that were interested in all matters technical, and that its website only publishes factual information; i.e., that which can be supported by mathematics and reflects all we see about us. It is this policy that appears to be offending our authorities (large companies, governments, academia, etc.).
Even Google is deliberately deselecting many of CalQlata's web pages, and in fact; refuses to recognise this website.
Could it be that they are all feeling a little exposed?
The purpose of this website was originally to supply low-cost calculators together with their supporting information (technical help pages) on a non-profit basis, with a view to encouraging non-technically minded individuals to delve into its secrets. CalQlata remains a philanthropical body technically and financially supported by its founder.
However, whilst studying Newton's laws of orbital motion, one of our contributors discovered that there were a number of missing bits in Isaac Newton's Principia. Moreover, he also concluded that nobody, in over three-hundred years, appears to have fully understood this work. This meant, that when a patent clerk gave academia a face-saving way out by declaring Newton wrong and that space time and gravity is distorted around bodies to fit his misguided belief that light possesses mass they jumped at it. And we have been stuck with it for over a hundred years. It has now become so engrained in the academic community that they happily now declare that the phrase; "the laws of physics do not apply" can be used to support any and all claims made by those that wish to dupe the tax payer into footing the bill for projects that can never succeed; the Hadron Collider, fusion energy, the search for black-holes, dark matter, event horizons, all forms of 'sustainable' energy, global warming, ozone-layers, CO₂ (the pollutant), etc., but which provide a never ending source of income for the authorities.
Whilst academia continues to support these impossible projects, the authorities get richer and the tax-payer fails to benefit from the advantages true science would otherwise provide:
1) Free, clean, safe energy for as long as the human animal will last.
2) The replacement of all forms of transport (including space-ships) with one, perfectly safe, quiet vehicle (the impulse drive) with only four moving parts.
3) The elimination of all roads, ports, bridges, fuel filling stations, energy generation plants, power transmission lines, etc.
4) Perfect chemicals, alloys and medicines (using mathematics) in minutes for next to no cost.
5) The elimination of all genuine forms of pollution.
It was therefore decided by its founder that CalQlata should try to make us all aware of what is going on around us, and suffer the machinations of those that prefer to hide the truth and ignore reality in favour of greater profit.
It is for this reason that CalQlata decided to publish the contributor's scientific discoveries, along with all his supporting mathematics and ask anyone that can disprove his work to do so. That was three years ago. Nobody has yet managed it.
The longer it takes for us to find a genuine alternative to our contributor's view of the universe, the greater will be our conviction that he must be correct.
We have encountered “blog” comments on the internet that CalQlata's scientific discoveries cannot be taken seriously because they haven’t been subjected to "peer review", which is a bizarre statement, because nowhere do these censors suggest who are its peers.
CalQlata considers anybody and everyone to be its peers, because we all have a vested interest in genuine natural science, which is why we have published all our discoveries - along with their mathematical proofs - on this website; for anybody and everyone, including academics, to refute. We even offer a prize to anyone that can disprove just one of them. However, the vast majority of scientific discoveries over the centuries have not been made by academics.
If these censors are referring to review specifically by academics, then we must disappoint, because we have very little confidence in an institution that practices the same level of validation as the religious establishment it displaced. For example; relativity, quantum theory, anti-matter, uncertainty, black-holes, dark matter, sub-atomic particles, EHT, fusion energy, man-made global warming, etc.
Moreover, we do not look kindly on institutions that ridicule pioneering discoverers like Alfred Wagener simply because he was not a member of their clique, and when the discoverer was proven correct and the institutional members were proven incorrect, not one had the grace and humility to admit their error and apologise publicly for their arrogance. Even today, these same institutions discuss, and claim ownership of, Wagener’s discovery without ever referring to him.
We, at CalQlata, have very strict rules for what constitutes genuine science. We will only accept theories that can be proven, not by experimentation or statistics - both of which are subject to error and manipulation - but mathematically. It is pointless presenting for review provable theories to an institution for which verification is unnecessary, and to whom the need to save face is of greater importance than their motto; “take nobody’s word for it”. Also, we, at CalQlata, prefer to attribute scientific discoveries to their actual creators, for example; E=mc² which belongs to Henri Poincaré not Einstein, and ‘aₒ’ which belongs to Rydberg not Bohr.
Whilst everything on this website is protected by copyright ...
CalQlata frequently generates what we believe to be "substantial, original contribution to knowledge" and where we do so on this website we claim special priority with the following insert: "{© uk-date-format}" in the heading of any section that contains such work.
Although CalQlata is happy for others to make use of our work we require that due reference be made to CalQlata along with the associated webpage.
CalQlata will take any necessary action to protect infringement of our copyright and would draw your attention to our Terms of website use.